Heropedia
Don't have an account?
Register
Advertisement
Register
Heropedia
Hero Factory Wiki
353
pages

Talk: Articles for Deletion

Back to page
Revision as of 20:27, 25 April 2011 by Toa Ausar (talk | contribs) (→‎Keep)
Sign in to edit

Talk Calmly
Discussion for individual Articles for Deletion may escalate into heated debate. It is essential that you try to keep a cool head when voting and/or commenting here

Pic789B30B7B620B419E9F86510B6FD7819

Important Notice
When nominating an article, please use the following format for the main header.
PAGETITLE | ~~~~~

Importantnotice pic

Template:Object

This template is currently unused and unnecessary because everything it can do is already accomplished more efficiently by the Template:Tool. --Åusår (Talk) 00:33, January 21, 2011 (UTC)

Delete

  1. Åusår (Talk) 00:33, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
  2. kerploom --Angel Bob 20:10, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Delete-o! --ThatDevilGuy(BRW third in command) 05:01, January 22, 2011 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Hang on a minute, alot of things aren't tools and we managed to neglect this?! Cirvihi (talk) 15:27, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Keep. Toa Roden

Comments

  • Cirvihi, what I'm saying is that the revised Template:Tool that ThatDevilGuy built has an adjustable "Header" thus it can be easily modified for use on articles for "Tools", "Weapons", "Objects", etc. --Åusår (Talk) 22:56, January 22, 2011 (UTC)

Template:Society

This template is currently unused and I can't foresee a need for it on this particular wiki that couldn't also be accomplished by Template:Organization or Template:Species. --Åusår (Talk) 00:33, January 21, 2011 (UTC)

Delete

  1. Åusår (Talk) 00:33, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
  2. IT DIES --Angel Bob 20:09, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
  3. ThatDevilGuy(BRW third in command) 05:03, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Schploom -Monasti(Talk) 17:49, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

Keep

Comments

Hero Core

No, I am not saying that we should delete the entire page. I'm putting it through here because up until now, I never knew how weird it looked having the Quaza Stone as a subsection of the Hero Core page. My idea is to rename the page "Quaza" and make a Hero Core subsection under it.

Rename Quaza

  1. Cirvihi (talk) 19:26, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Better idea: create an all-new page, entitled "Quaza". Hero Cores are very important to the story, and definitely have enough material on them to merit an individual page. ----Angel Bob 21:32, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
  2. I wasn't in favor of their merger in the first place, which is why I suggested the subsection compromise, meanwhile I definitely think that there should still be an article for Hero Cores, thus I second Angel Bob's call for the reemergence of an independent "Quaza" article. --Åusår (Talk) 00:20, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
  3. I'm sorry, but in my mind they are different things :/. And can't we just put a subsection there anyway? It shouldn't matter if there is already a page for it. -Monasti(Talk) 17:18, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Aye. Sounds good. King Joe CHFW Admin, HFRW Admin. Say somethin to me! 21:53, April 15, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

If you're saying that the page shouldn't be deleted at all, then you kind of took what I said. If you were suggesting that Hero Core should have a seperate page from Quaza, then feel free to post something in the AfC, though my opinion is that neither can afford to be seperate articles. Cirvihi (talk) 23:22, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

The thing is, Quaza and Hero Cores are distinct things: one a substance, one an object. Hero Cores have a good deal of beef to them, including their functions (including the Hero Cell) and the story behind them. Quaza also merits a page, being used in both Hero Cores and Quaza Spikes (actually, once Savage Planet rolls around I'd vouch for the creation of a Quaza Spike page, too). My opinion is that, rather than renaming the Hero Core article, we separate it. I think they'll both be big enough; I'll try to get around to sandboxing the separate pages and we'll see if you find them adequate. ----Angel Bob 00:11, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Template:AlphaTeamNav

I propose a name change from Alpha team to Heroes. We could then set it up so that there is a little menu on the side that says Alpha team, with the ATs names next to it, Rookies with the rookies names next to it etc. I think it would work better than what we have now.

Rename "Template:Heroes"

  1. -Monasti(Talk)

Leave it as "Template:AlphaTeamNav"

  1. We could easily build a separate HeroesNav in addition to the AlphaTeamNav. --Åusår (Talk) 00:34, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
  2. I agree with Ausar here. --ThatDevilGuy(Skulpedia) 06:15, April 16, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Wait a minute, you're ~Argentum~?! In that case, why don't we just make a new template or two for the other heroes? There could be one for Furno's team (which could use an acceptable name >__<) and one for the rookies/other heroes (Evo, Rocka, Thresher, etc). Personally, I suppose any solution could work as long as we're not supplying false information. I just felt that you should have more options to choose from. Cirvihi (talk) 20:28, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah I'm ~Argentum~ xD. And yes, ok, I like the idea. I just don't like the way that Alpha Team refers to people who aren't confirmed to be in the Alpha team. -Monasti(Talk) 08:34, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Upgrade

This page is a stub! I know that we should perhaps have this, but it isn't yet ready (Just like the Alpha Team ironically enough). I suggest deleting this and discuss bringing it back once the summer story rolls around, because that also sounds like an upgrade project.

Delete

  1. For now, of course! Cirvihi (talk) 00:56, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
  2. I agree with Cirvihi. --ThatDevilGuy(Skulpedia) 01:43, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Alright, fine. -Monasti(Talk) 09:57, April 25, 2011 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Instead of taking the time to complain about it and propose its' deletion, why not simply improve the article? --Åusår (Talk) 20:27, April 25, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.
Advertisement